Category 1

47 Subtle And Interesting Displays Of Intelligence

It takes time to know a person. After all, first impressions only scratch the surface, and we are far more complex than five minutes could ever reveal. But if you’re observant, you might pick up on certain cues that offer insight into what someone is really like.

Bored Panda

To give you a clearer picture of what to look for when gauging intelligence, we searched the internet and compiled a list of subtle, tell-tale signs others swear by. From how they speak to how they handle adversity, here’s what to watch for if you want a better sense of those around you.

They refrain from voicing their opinion on topics they know they aren't knowledgable in. Also the self awareness to make that realisation.anonymous:I've met some legitimately stupid people who were self aware and joked about it, I couldn't laugh along though, made me feel like a jerk.

© Photo:rkiive

When they don't actually know the answer to a query they admit freely, "I don't know".librarychick77:Or, even better - "I don't know, let's find out!"

© Photo:Just1morefix

Being able to step back and let people better equipped for the job at hand lead.Stupid people want to be in charge all the time. Smart people know when it's better to let someone else lead.Tablemonster:Which is why the army has such a poor leadership model.

© Photo:MajorMustard

The ability to stay level-headed when somebody challenges one of your firmly-held beliefs.

© Photo:Took-the-Blue-Pill

Ability to empathize. Emotional intelligence is sorely missed, when absent.

© Photo:Srslywhyumadbro

I've noticed highly intelligent people often stumble over their words and stutter a lot, almost like they're trying to say so much at once that they can't quite keep up with themselves.miloblue12:I wouldn't go as far as to say I'm intelligent, but while at work, I have so many things going on in my mind that sometimes I need a minute to step back and think about what I need to say. Otherwise, it just comes out as a jumbled mash and I also stutter.My mind goes too fast...my voice, not so much. Half the time, people just stare at me and wonder if I'm functioning properly...or if I'm plain stupid. I think it's both.

© Photo:dksandwitch

The ability to hold two opposed ideas in their head. A truly intelligent person can effectively argue a point and then effectively argue its inverse.TijuanaPoker:Sam Harris made a similar point on his podcast several episodes ago. Basically being able to hold both sides of a conversation coherently in your head or externally (I like to talk to myself but can do both) is actually a significant exercise in and of itself. It shows an understanding of topic and an awareness that your own thoughts are flawed, may as well consider the other side... It can almost seem schizophrenic to even yourself. But there is no better way to prepare yourself for an in depth conversation than to have already had it with one's self.

© Photo:Laminar_flo

Rather than academically intelligent, but emotionally intelligent:People who are good listeners. They take the time to learn all about the other person's problem without interrupting them, and are able to give perspective on the issue.R63VinylScratch:Listening is such an easy way to gain knowledge though. Especially since someone else is explaining it, most of the tine its already in simple terms. I love listening!

© Photo:silversoulXD

Openness to discussion and a desire to hearing the other side. Ability to change one's mind when presented with facts/logic.uncertain-ithink:This gets me in deep stuff, because I love doing this. I want to hear the other’s opinion and sort of have a healthy, non-heated debate about it. Then they start getting hostile with me because I think differently. Then I regret ever wanting to “debate”. And I get a big “I told you so” from them, usually going “this is why you don’t talk about x”.

© Photo:anon

They ask questions they already know answers to by utilizing whataboutism thus guiding you to the answer of your own question.ObliviousFriend:One of my elementary school teachers used to let kids who finished early help. Although, she would have us lead them through it with questions and hints like a teacher would, I have done this every time I have helped from then onwards. I would credit my teacher more than my own intelligence though.

© Photo:spaceborat

The most intelligent people i have met do not advertise themselves as intelligent people.

© Photo:shibuyarolecall

Appreciation of length, depth, details and complexity in the right context. Tired of this world being so obsessed with brevity and always trying to move onto the next thing.

© Photo:SkylakeCigarettes

People who move their eyes without moving their heads. I mean, they look around, but they don't turn their heads unless they have to.I don't know what the connection is, but I'm a teacher, I've taught over 2000 kids now, and the really self-aware ones tend to direct their eyes without turning their whole heads.anonymous:This is really interesting. I wonder if it has to do with being aware of what they look like.For example, I had a friend that would turn her head to stare at someone if she was trying to listen to their conversation. It baffled me that she was so unaware of how weird she looked.

© Photo:an_imperfect_lady

Being clear and concise, while using sensible vocabulary and verbiage.The people who waffle on at great length, using excess vocabulary as if they swallowed a dictionary? They're usually very dumb and desperately trying to compensate for it.librarychick77:But big words are fun...and accuracy is important. Especially in written conversations.There are lots of words to pick from, so why not pick the 'best' ones for your meaning?

© Photo:Eddie_Hitler

I've noticed that intelligent people are never really satisfied.Whether it's kids always wanting to learn more and never stop, or adults always trying to do things to improve themselves or their life. For example, people who make a ton of money may not feel like theyre satisfied with their job and will want to do more.

© Photo:itskelvinn

Someone who knows how to give proper constructive criticism and who can also accept criticism gracefully.

© Photo:blacknylons

Knowing when not to speak.

© Photo:anon

Spelling correctly and just caring about how you speak and write.

© Photo:Lofgrenskan

Asking questions!.... So many people don't, an enquiring mind is a sign of intelligence, as it's actively seeking/ gaining knowledge.

Advertisement

© Photo:rapunzell18

Problem-solving.We're used to measuring intelligence by how much data or knowledge someone has "learned"/remembers, but in the age of constant connection, that's largely irrelevant. The ability to *use* knowledge, to actually solve a problem or think critically, is a lot harder to teach, yet also a lot more important.

They think before opening their mouth.They can explain complicated things to people, knowing when to gloss over complexities and when to explain details.

They don't argue a point before letting the other person compromise himself without hope for redemption.

I would say careful timing. Shows situational awareness.

Curiosity. Always asking questions can sometimes make people appear child-like, which we often associate with less-developed intelligence.

Intelligent people learn for the sake of learning, regular people learn for an outcome.ApolloniusDrake:I know a very smart person who stopped there degree at a masters in engineering to make money and have a family. I know another very smart person who currently has a PHD at Stanford and still does research at Stanford.I feel people value different roads in life. Some like money. Some like learning. Some like the arts. Etc. To base someones intelligence on them wanting to learn or not is false.However if you want to base someones intelligence on there ability to absorb information then you would be very correct. Your ability to pick up on random facts and then remember them would show great intelligence.

© Photo:anon

Musical or artistic ability. I think there are different kinds of intelligence. Or at least intelligence that manifests itself in different forms. A gifted artist or musician has intellectual chops. They are using their brain to produce things that others, myself included, have only a limited capacity to understand or produce.

© Photo:FalstaffsMind

Listening rather than speaking all the time.

© Photo:anon

The willingness to answer an oddball question on its own terms, without converting it into something they feel more comfortable responding to.First noticed the (lack of) this trait in my own mother when I was nine or ten years old. I was curious about why north was always at the top of maps and asked her whether this was just a custom, or whether north-ness was inherently different from south-ness in some way.She began by explaining that this was a custom.Yes, I knew this was customary. Restated that to ask why it was a custom.She proceeded to explain that there weren't any east or west magnetic poles.Yes, I knew about magnetic poles. Restated that again to re-emphasize that the question was about north as opposed to south. (The other cardinal directions had been left out of the question for that reason).She went off on another irrelevant tangent.This was the first time I realized:1. She had no idea how to answer the actual question.2. She would rather change the subject and make herself seem authoritative than admit a gap in her understanding.Started watching people's responses afterward and discovered that a startling number of people will subtly "convert" a question that's slightly outside their comfort zone into a different question where they can recite an answer by rote. The rare person who does grapple with an oddball question on its own terms seems more to do so as a matter of open-mindedness than education.

© Photo:doublestitch

Good signs- Curiosity. Wanting to know why everything happens, or how.- People who ask, "What about this variable?" They consider more than what they are presented with in order to complete the scenario.Some Bad signs- Sometimes unable to come to a conclusion due to too many variables. There isn't always an elegant solution.- Self aware of their intelligence. leads to arrogance.

© Photo:Project2r

Im not sure whether its overlooked, but I think how someone can deal with hypotheticals is a good indicator. Not being able to work within the rules of a hypothetical is probably a good sign of a lack of intelligence, or at the very least a lack of intellectual honesty.

© Photo:farm_ecology

- listening intently even though they are the real experts in the area- listening and learning when they know nothing about the subject- willingness to ask for help when they're stuck.

© Photo:airawear

Listening more than you talk.

Active listening - actually listening to what someone is saying and asking questions to help them clarify their position.

Walking away *before* an argument starts.

Genuinely listening and not just waiting for their turn to speak.

People who know how to handle people.They can see a situation going south and subtly influence interactions to avoid danger, or keep from escalating a situation.Either through carefully worded sentences to descalate a situation, provide missing context before a misunderstanding occurs, pointedly including ignored parties into a discussion, or just rearranging the room.Its strategic, deliberate, and subtle. It predicts cause and effect all towards creating a idealised outcome.

Observing their surroundings/noticing things, being more open to opinions, more empathy in general.There's so many variations of intelligence though, I would actually be interested to see a thread like signs of experience.

They can refrain from arguing when they see it's pointless.Lots of people assume a guy who doesn't voice out and engage in arguments is because he isn't intelligent enough or witty enough to carry himself through.A lot of times they can, they just don't see the worth in it.For example, involving politics, instead of engaging in an argument with a person in class who is very emotionally involved and rather passionate in the moment yelling things, you can chuckle and say smile and let the person think they've won.

A true sense of humor. It takes timing, being able to read people/situations, knowing when to shut up, and not taking ones self too seriously. plus, who doesn't like being around someone who's funny??

© Photo:mslaurza

Controversial as it may seem, the most truthful people are usually the most intelligence. Not only are they more able to see themselves clearly and accept themselves instead of lying to themselves, but also this.Everyone lies to a degree. Intelligent people are usually much better liars - not at convincing people; but at knowing what lies will work and what won't. As such, the ones you believe are liars are probably dumb, whereas the honest people are just much smarter. Maybe.

© Photo:AttackPenguin666

Compassion, empathy, and kindness.

© Photo:anon

The sensitivity to detect people's subtle emotions when they say nothing or just compromise.

A sense of humor. Not saying you have to be funny to be smart, but you generally have to be at least somewhat intelligent to be funny.

I see a lot of people saying individuals who can say idk. I agree 100%. However on the otherside of the coin i believe people who actually know a large number of random facts and information is proof of a great intelligence. That one individual that always seems to have relevant input to a topic. Most IQ tests will question you randomly about history, geography, etc.

Modesty, and luckily for me, I'm the most modest person I know.

Being good at puns. Everyone who I know that is sharp minded is usually ready with a pun.

When someone doesn't make fun of the fly episode of Breaking Bad. It's trendy to make fun of it, but in reality there's a lot going on there that most people don't even see (symbolism) and if I see someone else who gets that and is brave enough to say it, I immediately assume they're extremely intelligent and probably an independent thinker too.

© Photo:terattt

47 Subtle And Interesting Displays Of Intelligence

It takes time to know a person. After all, first impressions only scratch the surface, and we are far more complex than five minutes co...
Chart shows Iran may have put sea mines in Strait of Hormuz

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Semiofficial news agencies in Iran published a chart Thursday suggesting the country’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard put sea mines into the Strait of Hormuz during the war.

Associated Press FILE - Two police officers walk in front of an anti-U.S. billboard depicting American aircraft being caught by Iranian armed forces in a fishing net beneath the words in Farsi, Government supporters gather ahead of the funeral procession for Maj. Gen. Majid Khademi, head of intelligence for Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, in Tehran, Iran, Wednesday, April 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Francisco Seco) Ali, 4, holds a toy horse next to the tent his family uses as a shelter after fleeing Israeli bombardment in southern Lebanon, in Beirut, Lebanon, Wednesday, April 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Emilio Morenatti) Smoke rises following several Israeli airstrikes in Beirut, Lebanon, Wednesday, April 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Hassan Ammar) A rescue worker extinguishes burning cars at the site of an Israeli airstrike in central Beirut, Lebanon, Wednesday, April 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Hussein Malla)

Iran War

The reports came from the ISNA news agency, as well as Tasnim, which is believed to be close to the Guard.

The chart showed a large circle marked “danger zone” in Farsi over the Traffic Separation Scheme, which was the route ships used to take through the strait. That was where the Guard allegedly put the mines.

Advertisement

It suggested that ships travel up north through waters closer to Iran’s mainland near Larak Island, a route that some ships were observed taking during the war.

The dates on the chart ran from Feb. 28 until Thursday, April 9.

It’s unclear if the Guard had cleared its alleged mining in the route. And it likely served as a pressure tactic as Iran, Israel and the United States now are in an uneasy, two-week ceasefire ahead of possible negotiations in Islamabad.

Chart shows Iran may have put sea mines in Strait of Hormuz

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Semiofficial news agencies in Iran published a chart Thursday suggesting the country’s paramilitary ...
Analysis-As Trump claims victory, Iran emerges bruised but powerful with leverage over Hormuz

By Samia Nakhoul

Reuters

DUBAI, April 8 (Reuters) - Nearly six weeks of war in Iran have ended, for now, with President Donald Trump claiming victory, but the U.S.-Iran ceasefire locks in a harsh reality: an entrenched, radical government with control over the Strait of Hormuz and a powerful lever over global energy markets and Gulf rivals, analysts say.

The shockwaves have rippled outward, contributing to global economic strains and bringing conflict to Gulf neighbours whose economies depend on stability.

"This war will be ‌remembered as Trump's grave strategic miscalculation. One whose consequences reshaped the region in unintended ways," Middle East scholar Fawaz Gerges told Reuters.

Before the war, the Strait - a narrow passage carrying around a fifth of the world’s oil and gas - was formally treated as ‌an international waterway. Iran monitored it, harassed shipping and intermittently intercepted vessels, but it stopped short of asserting outright control.

In the new reality, Tehran has moved from shadowing tankers to effectively dictating terms. It currently functions as the de facto gatekeeper of the shipping route, selectively deciding on passage and on what terms. Iran wants to charge ships for safe ​passage.

Additionally, Iran has demonstrated resilience under sustained attack and retained the capacity to escalate further, projecting influence across multiple fronts and strategic choke points. Its reach extends through Lebanon and Iraq via Hezbollah and Shi’ite militias, and into the Bab el-Mandeb in the Red Sea, leveraging the sphere of influence of its Houthi allies.

At home, Iran's leadership remains firmly in control - even though the country's economy is in tatters and great swathes of infrastructure in ruins from American and Israeli bombs.

"What did the U.S.–Israeli war actually achieve?" asked Gerges. "Regime change in Tehran? No. The surrender of the Islamic Republic? No. Containment of Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium? No. An end to Tehran’s support for its regional allies? No."

Iran has absorbed the blows while retaining - and in some cases strengthening - its core instruments of power, said four analysts and three Gulf government sources who spoke to Reuters for this story.

As well as Iran's control ‌of Hormuz, the political picture now, they noted, is of a more brutal, empowered establishment, unaccounted nuclear ⁠material, continued missile and drone production, and ongoing support for regional militias.

Echoing Trump, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Wednesday said Washington had won a decisive military victory, and that Iran's missile programme had been functionally destroyed. The State Department and White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The United States, Israel and Iran agreed to a two-week ceasefire and U.S. and Iranian officials are expected to hold talks from Friday to discuss ⁠a long-term settlement.

While the ceasefire may halt the fighting, the Gulf officials said its durability hinges on addressing the deeper conflicts shaping the region’s security and energy landscape.

Any deal that falls short of a comprehensive settlement risks entrenching Iranian leverage rather than constraining it, they add.

Ebtesam Al‑Ketbi, president of the Emirates Policy Center described the truce as a fragile pause - one likely to institutionalize new forms of instability unless it expands well beyond a narrow cessation of hostilities.

“This ceasefire is not a solution; it is a test of intentions,” Ketbi told Reuters. "If it does not evolve into a broader agreement redefining the rules of engagement - in Hormuz and ​across ​proxy theatres - it will amount to little more than a tactical pause before a more dangerous and complex escalation."

“If Trump reaches a deal with Iran without addressing ​core issues - ballistic missiles, drones, proxies, nuclear concerns, and the rules governing Hormuz - then the conflict is effectively ‌left unresolved and the region exposed,” said Ketbi.

Advertisement

HORMUZ IS RED LINE FOR GULF COUNTRIES

Iran, for its part, has put forward to Washington terms that include sanctions relief, recognition of enrichment rights, compensation for war damage and continued control over the Strait - underscoring just how far apart the sides remain.

Trump acknowledged receiving the Iranian plan and called it "a workable basis to negotiate".

For Gulf countries who rely on Hormuz to export their oil, the Strait remains a non-negotiable red line, added Saudi analyst Ali Shihabi. "Any outcome that leaves the waterway effectively in Iranian hands would be a defeat for President Trump", with the potential repercussions of high energy prices extending into the midterm elections, he said.

What the war may nonetheless open up for Tehran, Shihabi added, is the prospect of a negotiated settlement - potentially including sanctions relief.

From a Gulf perspective, the picture is deeply unsettling. Mistrust of Iran is running high following Tehran's strikes on energy facilities and commercial hubs across the region. More troubling still, the war has transformed Hormuz into an explicit instrument of leverage and coercion, analysts say.

The economic stakes are equally stark. Iran wants to charge fees for ships passing through the Hormuz ‌shipping lanes as part of any permanent peace deal, a move that would reverberate far beyond the Gulf, hitting global energy markets and the economic lifelines of ​states along the opposite shore.

“If Iran can extract millions per ship, the implications are enormous - not just for the Gulf, but for the global economy,” Ketbi said. “In that sense, ​the outcome is not just a regional setback, but a systemic shift with worldwide consequences.”

More broadly, the analysts warned, it would signal ​a fundamental change in the regional order - from a strait governed by international norms to one effectively policed by a hostile state emboldened, not weakened, by war.

GULF DEMANDS

The ceasefire, brokered by Pakistan, followed a war launched on February ‌28 by Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said they aimed to curb Iran's regional ​power, dismantle its nuclear programme and create conditions for Iranians to topple their ​rulers.

Both sides declared victory. Trump called the ceasefire a “total and complete victory,” saying U.S. forces had achieved their objectives, while Iran's Supreme National Security Council claimed Trump had accepted its conditions.

But the war has yet to deprive Iran of its stockpile of near‑weapons‑grade enriched uranium or its ability to strike neighbours with missiles and drones. The leadership, which faced a mass uprising months ago, withstood the superpower onslaught with no sign of collapse.

A Gulf source said restoring trust with Tehran would require stringent, written commitments - not informal assurances - ​covering non‑interference, freedom of navigation, and the security of key maritime corridors, including Hormuz, as well as ‌the national security requirements of the Gulf states.

Those conditions, the Gulf source said, were conveyed to Pakistani mediators to be included as part of a comprehensive settlement.

An Israeli official said senior Trump administration officials had assured Israel that they would insist ​on previous conditions, such as the removal of Iran's nuclear material, a halt to enrichment and the elimination of ballistic missiles.

Pakistan's prime minister said Iranian and U.S. delegations were expected to meet in Islamabad on Friday for what would be ​the first official peace talks since the war began.

(Writing by Samia Nakhoul; Additional reporting by Trevor Hunnicutt in Washington; Editing by Frank Jack Daniel)

Analysis-As Trump claims victory, Iran emerges bruised but powerful with leverage over Hormuz

By Samia Nakhoul DUBAI, April 8 (Reuters) - Nearly six weeks of war in Iran have ended, for now, with President Donald Trump clai...
John Legend Says His Semi-Finalists on “The Voice” Were His Top 3 Singers After the Blind Auditions

John Legend revealed his semi-finalists on The Voice were his top three singers after the blind auditions

People John Legend on The VoiceCredit: Trae Patton/NBC via Getty

NEED TO KNOW

  • Team Legend's semi-finalists are KJ Willis, Syd Millevoi and Lucas West

  • Nine contestants will compete in the semi-finals on Monday, April 13 on NBC

John Legendhas a sixth sense.

The Grammy winner, 47, revealed in a roundtable interview on Thursday, April 9, that his semi-finalists forThe Voice: Battle of Championswere his top three singers after the blind auditions.

“I just looked at my notes, and these three were my top three after the blinds, just so you know,” Legend said of KJ Willis, Syd Millevoi and Lucas West. “That's major.”

“That doesn't always stay the case. Some people, they show me something different later in the competition,” he continued. “But I could just tell from these three artists' performances in the blinds that they were all special, and it makes sense that they're in this place that they are now.”

“Each of them is such a talented artist,” Legend shared. “They're all so gifted as vocalists, as performers, and they bring something distinct to the competition. I couldn't have picked three better representatives for Team Legend going into the top nine.”

Advertisement

John Legend, Kelly Clarkson, Adam LevineCredit: Trae Patton/NBC via Getty

Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

The nine contestants competing for a chance to win season 29 ofThe Voiceinclude Team Legend's Willis, Millevoi and West; Team Adam's Alexia Jayy, Jared Shoemaker and Jeremy Keith; and Team Kelly's JW Griffin, Liv Ciara and Mikenley Brown.

JW Griffin, Liv Ciara, Kelly Clarkson, Mikenley BrownCredit: Trae Patton/NBC via Getty

As Team Legend prepares for the semi-finals, they all reflected on their key takeaways from this season. For Millevoi, it's remembering to be herself.

“You forget a lot of things during the course of this competition just because it's such a high-stress situation, but being yourself,” Millevoi said. “It's such an individual thing and even just us three, Lucas, KJ and I, are so different and that's what makes it so special. So, remembering your individuality at the end of the day.”

Legend added, “Being you is your superpower because no one else can be you. You are a unique brew of experiences. Your life story, your influences, that's unique. That's the advantage, and if you lean into it, that's your superpower.”

“We're not trying to stamp out the thing that makes you special,” he continued. “It's your foundation and the soul of who you are. We want to enhance it, bring it out and make the most of it.”

The semi-finals ofThe Voice: Battle of Championswill air on Monday, April 13 on NBC.

Read the original article onPeople

John Legend Says His Semi-Finalists on “The Voice” Were His Top 3 Singers After the Blind Auditions

John Legend revealed his semi-finalists on The Voice were his top three singers after the blind auditions NEED TO KNOW ...
'Jeopardy!' contestant to try for 20 consecutive wins tonight

A "Jeopardy!" contestant is having a historic run.

USA TODAY

Contestant Jamie Ding captured his 19th consecutive win on April 8, bringing his total winnings to $539,573 and cementing him on the game show's leaderboard.

Ding,a native of the Detroit area, is among thetop 10 in "Jeopardy!" history.His 19th win tied him for the eighth spot for most consecutive wins. Separately, Ding is ranked seventh in all time highest winnings from regular-season play, according to aFacebook postby the game show. Ding has a career total of 618 questions correct and 42 incorrect,according to TheJeopardyFan.com.

"Jeopardy!" competition continues on Thursday, April 9. Should Ding win, it would mark his 20th straight win and tie him for seventh place in most consecutive games won.

Is Jamie Ding still on 'Jeopardy!'?How Michigan native fared

Ding joins league of best 'Jeopardy!' contestants

Ding's current win streak may have already earned him a spot on the "Jeopardy!" leaderboard, but there's still a relatively large number between him and the all-time record.

The leaderboard for most consecutive wins includes:

Advertisement

  1. Ken Jennings, 74 wins in 2004 ($2,520,700)

  2. Amy Schneider, 40 wins in 2022 ($1,382,800)

  3. Matt Amodio, 38 wins in 2021 ($1,518,601)

  4. James Holzhauer, 32 wins in 2019 ($2,462,216)

  5. Mattea Roach, 23 games in 2022 ($560,983)

  6. Cris Pannullo, 21 games in 2022 ($748,286)

  7. Julia Collins, 20 games in 2014 ($428,100)

  8. Tie between Jamie Ding in 2026, Jason Zuffranieri in 2019 ($532,496) and David Madden in 2005 ($430,400)

"Jeopardy!" contestant Jamie Ding is pictured smiling while holding his buzzer.

Ding would also have to win a little over $21,000 more in money to be ranked sixth in all time highest winnings from regular-season play. That record is also held by Jennings, who left the game with $2,520,700 in winnings from regular-season play.

The all-time winnings record, which includes "Jeopardy!" tournament play, totals at $4,938,436 and is held by contestant Brad Rutter.

Watch:'Jeopardy!' contestant 'manifested' the outcome. See how it ended.

Public officials, universities shout out 'Jeopardy!' contestant

Government officials and universities alike have noticed Ding's "Jeopardy!" performance, with some shouting out the contestant on social media to wish him luck before games. In New Jersey,where Ding lives, Gov. Mikie Sherrill took to X to grant well wishes before an early competition.

Wayne State University, where Ding's father is a professor, alsomade a supportive poston social media platform Facebook, writing "We're proud to be a part of this champion's journey!"

How to watch 'Jeopardy!'

"Jeopardy!" airs as a syndicated television show and streams on Hulu and Peacock. To find your local station and air time,visit Jeopardy.com.

Kate Perez covers national trends and breaking news for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kperez@usatodayco.com or on X @katecperez_.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:'Jeopardy!' contestant Jamie Ding set to try for 20 consecutive wins

'Jeopardy!' contestant to try for 20 consecutive wins tonight

A "Jeopardy!" contestant is having a historic run. Contestant Jamie Ding captured his 19th consecutive win on April 8, b...

 

SnS JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com