Category 1

The countdown is on for the 98th Oscars, with Conan O'Brien back and a 'moving' in memoriam

Lynette Howell Taylorhas seen theOscarsfrom a few different vantage points: As a nominee, in 2019 for "A Star is Born," as a producer of the broadcast in 2020, as a member of the film academy's board of governors and, for the last three years, as awards chair. It's made her first year as the president of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences feel like a natural transition. And one thing she is certain of is that every Oscars is unique.

Associated Press

"Every year is different," Taylor said in a recent interview alongside filmAcademy CEO Bill Kramer. "Every season is different. Every set of movies is different. And so, the show is always different every year."

It's a tricky thing to both honor the people in the room while also making an entertaining show for a home audience. But behind the scenes, from returning hostConan O'Briento the producers and Emmy-winning production design team, is a group of people who know how to dazzle a global audience.

"I think we, in the past couple of years, have really hit that balance right," Kramer said. "We're looking at that puzzle constantly and this year is going to be spectacular."

Final preparations are underway for the98th Academy Awards on Sundayand everyone is feeling good about what they have planned, including performances, tributes and a special spotlight for theirnewest award for casting. It helps that the top nominees,"Sinners" and "One Battle After Another,"happen to be great.

"It's always about the movies and the movies this year? They're all the things," Taylor said. "There are escapist movies, big commercial movies, there are movies that are really brave and really bold in their storytelling … I get really emotional when I talk about the quality of this year's films."

Growing the audience

The ratings forthe Oscarshave been ticking up since plummeting to an all-time low in 2021 during the pandemic. The winning movie last year, "Anora," might have been smaller than "Oppenheimer" the previous year, but ratings still went up slightly from 19.5 million in 2024 to19.7 million in 2025.

The show had an especially big lift among people ages 18 to 49, driven by mobile and laptop watches from younger viewers. Last year was the first time the ceremony was available to stream live on Hulu. They've also been partnering with popular internet personalities likeAmelia Dimoldenbergin an effort to reach new audiences in a way that still feels "Academy appropriate."

"Our audiences are growing," Kramer said. "And young people are watching the show in ways that we've not seen before and that's really great."

Early planning and last-minute pivots

Boosted ratings might not be a coincidence with the fact that planning for the show has been starting earlier and earlier in recent years.

"It gives us time to talk through so many things pre-nominations. So once the nominations happen, we can start focusing on what that means for the show," Kramer said. "There's not a lot of last-minute panicking over anything."

One of the ways that will manifest in this year's show is the production design, from the set to the red carpet, details are pored over for many months.

Advertisement

"They've done such beautiful work … and this year, they've just gone a whole step further with a different feel that's very intimate and warm," Taylor said. "It's a bit of a departure."

Though a lot is pre-planned, they're also always thinking of ways to meet the moment, which has led to some major showstoppers.Last year's big openerwith Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande was a relatively late addition and ended up being one of the more memorable parts.

"We're open to pivoting, depending on what's going on in the world," Kramer said.

A very special in memoriam

The deaths of many beloved figures in the film world over the past year have hit hard, includingRobert Redford,Diane Keaton,Rob Reiner,Catherine O'Hara,Robert Duvall,Val Kilmer,Malcolm-Jamal Warner,James Van Der BeekandClaudia Cardinale, just to name a few.

Last year Morgan Freeman took the stage to honor Gene Hackman, who had been found dead just days earlier, and others. This year there have been rumors about Meg Ryan and Billy Crystal joining forces for Reiner, but the organizers are neither confirming nor denying that reunion.

"Obviously we're paying special attention to the in memoriam this year. It's going to be robust and beautiful and very, very moving," Kramer said. "We won't give away any secrets. You'll have to tune in."

As always, there will be a longer version of the in memoriam available online to recognize people who might not make the broadcast cut.

It'll be three-and-a-half hours. Really.

The longest broadcast in Oscars history, the 74th show in 2002 hosted by Whoopi Goldberg, clocked in at four hours and 23 minutes. But even with a new category, the people behind the show are striving to do it in three-and-a-half hours, or less.

"It's a lot of moving pieces, but it's totally doable," Kramer said. "And casting's going to get a gorgeous moment on the show."

Taylor added that awards shows are like movies. Sometimes a long film can feel like "watching paint dry." Other times, it flies by.

"We really focus on making the show as dynamic and emotionally connecting as possible and really celebrating movies in a way that audiences want to stay tuned for," Taylor said.

Looking toward 100 and a future on YouTube

Planning is already underway for the 100th Oscars in 2028. They're also charting a course beyond too: In 2029, the Oscars will move fromtraditional broadcast television to YouTube.

"YouTube signals our desire to be a more global organization that reaches more audiences around the world," Kramer said. "The Oscars are just one part of a year-round deal where we're building a hub for cinema on YouTube that will have our SciTech Awards, our museum programming. Google Arts and Culture will be digitizing components of our collection and making it available to the public. This is all about reach and growing audiences."

The countdown is on for the 98th Oscars, with Conan O’Brien back and a 'moving' in memoriam

Lynette Howell Taylorhas seen theOscarsfrom a few different vantage points: As a nominee, in 2019 for "A Star is Bor...
North Korean leader Kim watches cruise missile tests with his daughter

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and histeenage daughterobserved tests of strategic cruise missiles fired from a warship, state media reported Wednesday, as North Korea threatened responses toU.S.-South Korean military drills.

Associated Press This photo provided by the North Korean government shows its leader Kim Jong Un, right, and his daughter, left, watch what it says the cruise missiles launches from the naval destroyer, the Choe Hyon, via video Tuesday, March 10, 2026, in North Korea. Independent journalists were not given access to cover the event depicted in this image distributed by the North Korean government. The content of this image is as provided and cannot be independently verified. Korean language watermark on image as provided by source reads: This photo provided by the North Korean government shows its leader Kim Jong Un, front right, and his daughter, second right at front, watch what it says the cruise missiles launches from the naval destroyer, the Choe Hyon, via video, in North Korea, Tuesday, March 10, 2026. Independent journalists were not given access to cover the event depicted in this image distributed by the North Korean government. The content of this image is as provided and cannot be independently verified. Korean language watermark on image as provided by source reads: This photo provided by the North Korean government shows what it says the test-firing of the cruise missiles from the naval destroyer, the Choe Hyon, in North Korea, Tuesday, March 10, 2026. Independent journalists were not given access to cover the event depicted in this image distributed by the North Korean government. The content of this image is as provided and cannot be independently verified. Korean language watermark on image as provided by source reads:

North Korea Koreas Tensions

Images sent by the Korean Central News Agency showed the two in a conference room looking at a screen showing weapons being fired fromthe Choe Hyon, a year-old naval destroyer.

Kim Jong Un watched the missiles launches via video on Tuesday and underscored the need to maintain "a powerful and reliable nuclear war deterrent," KCNA reported in a dispatch that did not mention his daughter.

The girl, reportedly named Kim Ju Ae and about 13, has accompanied her father at numerous prominent events including military parades and weapons launches since late 2022.South Korea's spy agencyassessed last month Kim Jong Un was close to designating her as his heir.

Advertisement

KCNA said the missiles hit target islands off North Korea's west coast. It quoted Kim Jong Un as saying the launches were meant to demonstrate the navy's strategic offensive posture and get troops familiarized with weapons firings.

Kim Jong Un observed similar cruise missile launches from the Choe Hyon in person last week, but his daughter was not seen at that appearance.

Tuesday's missile firings came after the start of the springtime U.S.-South Korean military drills that North Korea views as an invasion rehearsal.

On Tuesday, Kim Jong Un's sister and senior official,Kim Yo Jong,warned the drills reveal again the U.S. and South Korea's "inveterate repugnancy toward" North Korea. She said North Korea will "convince the enemies of our war deterrence."

The 11-day Freedom Shield drill that began Monday is largely a computer-simulated command post exercise and will be accompanied by a field training program. North Korea often reacts to the two sets of training with its own weapons tests.

North Korean leader Kim watches cruise missile tests with his daughter

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and histeenage daughterobserved tests of strategic cruise missi...
Analysis-Anthropic has strong case against Pentagon blacklisting, legal experts say

By Jack Queen

Reuters

NEW YORK, March 11 (Reuters) - Anthropic's lawsuit challenging its Pentagon blacklisting is likely to test the reach of an obscure law aimed at guarding military systems against sabotage, and legal experts say the artificial intelligence lab appears to have a strong case that President Donald Trump's administration overstepped.

Anthropic said in its lawsuit filed on Monday that the Defense Department's decision to exclude the company from military contracts by designating it as a supply chain risk ‌violated its free speech and due process rights and was aimed at punishing the company for its views on AI safety in warfare.

The designation could cut Anthropic's 2026 revenue by multiple billions of dollars and cause reputational harm, company executives said ‌Tuesday.

In labeling Anthropic as a supply chain risk, the Pentagon invoked a rarely used law that allows it to bar companies from certain contracts if they risk exposing military information systems to enemy infiltration. The law has never been tested in court or used against a U.S. company, according to a Reuters review of legal databases.

Courts often ​defer to the executive branch's judgment on national security, and that will likely be the centerpiece of the government's defense. But five national security law experts told Reuters the Pentagon may have overstepped.

"It's not at all clear that the statute can even apply to an American company where there's no foreign entanglement," said University of Minnesota Law School professor Alan Rozenshtein.

The Defense Department said it does not comment on pending litigation.

'EXQUISITE' TECHNOLOGY

Anthropic, which is incorporated and headquartered in the U.S., said it is not an "adversary," which the Trump administration has defined in executive orders to mean China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba and Venezuela, according to Anthropic's lawsuit.

The company also said Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave no explanation for how Anthropic's Claude AI tool constituted a supply chain risk despite its continued use by the U.S. military and Hegseth's own praise of Claude as "exquisite" technology that the Defense Department ‌would "love" to work with during a February 24 meeting with Anthropic cited in the lawsuit.

The military ⁠has used Claude as recently as last month during strikes on Iran, according to Reuters reports.

Hegseth designated Anthropic a national security supply chain risk on March 3 after the company refused to lift restrictions on Claude that prohibit the military from using it for autonomous weapons or domestic surveillance.

In a February 27 social media post announcing the designation, Hegseth accused Anthropic of cloaking itself in the "sanctimonious rhetoric of 'effective altruism'" to "strong-arm the United ⁠States military into submission."

Anthropic has said AI is not reliable enough for autonomous weapons and that it opposes domestic surveillance as a matter of principle. The Pentagon has said that Anthropic's restrictions could endanger American lives.

'SURVEIL, DENY, DISRUPT'

Under U.S. law, a supply chain risk is a threat that an adversary could sabotage, infiltrate or disrupt a federal information technology system or network.

The law, known as Section 3252, invoked by the Pentagon, allows the defense secretary to exclude companies from certain contracts to guard against the risk that an "adversary" may "sabotage, maliciously introduce unwanted function" or otherwise "subvert" a military information system to "surveil, deny, disrupt, or otherwise degrade" its ​function.

The ​Pentagon separately designated Anthropic a supply chain risk under a similar law that could eventually broaden contract exclusions to the civilian government. Anthropic filed a separate legal ​challenge to that designation on Monday.

Advertisement

The Pentagon can only exclude companies under 3252 as a last resort, and ‌other defense contractors are not required to stop working with them entirely.

Reuters could not identify any other companies that have been publicly designated supply chain risks under 3252, although the obscure government procurement statute does not require public disclosure of designations.

'BAD BLOOD'

Amos Toh, a national security law expert at the left-leaning Brennan Center for Justice, said nothing about Claude's usage policies appeared to pose foreign sabotage or subversion risks.

"These are basically safety protocols. You can debate whether these protocols are acceptable or not, but they run directly counter to the risk that the law is designed to regulate," Toh said.

Anthropic's lawsuit said that the supply chain risk designation punishes the company for its views on AI safety in violation of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects free speech and expression.

Legal experts said Trump and Hegseth's public attacks on Anthropic, including a social media post in which Trump called it a "RADICAL LEFT WOKE COMPANY," could bolster this argument.

"A lot of things Hegseth has said and the Pentagon has done undermine their case and suggest there was personal animus and bad blood between the parties, and that ‌the Pentagon had it out for Anthropic," said Joel Dodge, a law expert at Vanderbilt University.

Anthropic also said Hegseth's supply chain risk order violated its Fifth ​Amendment right to due process by imposing "draconian punishments" without any "meaningful process," factual findings or opportunity for Anthropic to challenge them.

SECOND-GUESSING THE PRESIDENT

Courts are generally reluctant to question federal ​agency decisions but are especially deferential to the executive branch's judgment on national security matters.

This would likely be the centerpiece of ​the government's defense, according to legal experts, who said Justice Department lawyers could cite a long line of cases where courts have found that it is generally not the place of judges to second-guess how the president ‌and the military he commands defend the country.

The government could similarly argue that the president and his ​cabinet secretaries have broad authority to choose suppliers and that the military ​cannot rely on a vendor whose usage policies constrain military action.

The Justice Department could also cite legal precedent stating that contract decisions are not First Amendment violations if they are supported by legitimate policy or operational reasons.

Eric Crusius, an attorney and government contract specialist who is not involved in the case, said the government is trying to impose the "death penalty" on Anthropic and will need to show "there was no alternative and that they meticulously considered other options prior to pulling the trigger."

'ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS'

Anthropic said ​in its lawsuit that Hegseth's decision violated the Administrative Procedure Act, a law that allows courts to ‌overturn actions that are found to be "arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law."

Legal experts said the apparent contradictions in the government's position are strong evidence that Hegseth's decision was arbitrary.

"The government was simultaneously ​threatening to use the (Defense Production Act) to force Anthropic to sell its services, using its services in active military operations, and saying it's too dangerous to use them in government contracts," said University of Minnesota Law School professor Alan ​Rozenshtein.

"Not all of these things can be true," he said.

(Reporting by Jack Queen in New York; Editing by Noeleen Walder and Christopher Cushing)

Analysis-Anthropic has strong case against Pentagon blacklisting, legal experts say

By Jack Queen NEW YORK, March 11 (Reuters) - Anthropic's lawsuit challenging its Pentagon blacklisting is ...
Nina Dobrev in Miu Miu Micro Miniskirt Proves She Is Truly an It Girl

If there's one thing Paris Fashion Week does best, it's turning the streets into a runway for statement style. This time,Nina Dobrevproved the same as she stepped out, serving effortless cool-girl energy in a striking Miu Miu micro miniskirt look that instantly caught every fashion watcher's attention.

The "Vampire Diaries" actress turned heads in a chic ensemble that balanced minimalism with a confident edge. With its sleek tailoring and playful styling, the look captured the Gen-Z-approved aesthetic the brand is known for. With this look, the diva showed us how to make a simple silhouette feel runway-ready.

Nina Dobrev brings cool girl energy to PFW in Miu Miu micro miniskirt

Instead of keeping things formal, Nina Dobrev dared to serve street-style sass at its best for her star-studded outing during the Paris Fashion Week 2026. She leaned into the playful preppy aesthetic that Miu Miu has recently made its signature. Her look featured a dark brown micro miniskirt with the brand's logo near the hem. This helped her flaunt her legs and elongate them. This was styled with a burgundy knit top, which worked wonders for her frame.

Advertisement

This was layered over a crisp white collared shirt that peeked through at the neckline and waist, adding a Gen-Z-approved school-girl touch to the look. Further, she added a sporty touch with a cropped brown zip-up jacket, accented with beige trim, giving the outfit an unexpectedly polished feel. Further, Dobrev completed the ensemble with tan mid-calf boots, which complemented the overall aesthetic of the look.

Dobrev's accessory game was also just right. She added a structured caramel-brown leather handbag that complemented the tones of her outfit. She also added minimal accessories, holding a pair of sunglasses. Meanwhile, her locks were styled in a slightly messy updo, adding to the effortless sass of her look. Even her flawless makeup, with blushed cheeks and nude lips, added some panache, making this look a standout moment at Paris Fashion Week.

Originally reported by Mehak Walia onTheFashionSpot.com.

The postNina Dobrev in Miu Miu Micro Miniskirt Proves She Is Truly an It Girlappeared first onReality Tea.

Nina Dobrev in Miu Miu Micro Miniskirt Proves She Is Truly an It Girl

If there's one thing Paris Fashion Week does best, it's turning the streets into a runway for statement style. This time,Nina Dobre...
Paul McCartney Stuns Beatles Fans After Revealing Yoko Ono's Claim About John Lennon's Sexuality

Paul McCartneyhassparked outrageamongBeatlesfans after resurfacing acontroversial claimonce made byYoko Onoabout her husbandJohn Lennon's sexuality.

Bored Panda

The unexpected revelation quicklyignited heated reactions online, with many fansquestioningwhy the topic was brought up decades after Lennon's tragic passing and accusing McCartney of speaking about a former bandmate who isno longer here to respond.

One furious commenter wrote, "Paul McCartney is such a creep. Only a nasty, evil man would sell out his past band-matewho is not around to defend himself."

Paul McCartney first made the controversial claims in a 2015 interview withVanity Fair, which has recently resurfaced

Image credits:Mike Marsland/WireImage

TheBeatles' founder, co-lead vocalist, and rhythm guitarist John Lennon had three reportedly high-profile relationships during his lifetime.

He was married twice, first to Cynthia Powell from 1962 to 1968 and then to Yoko Ono from 1969 until his demise in 1980.

During a high-profile 18-month separation from Ono, Lennon reportedly lived and worked in Los Angeles and New York with his personal assistant, May Pang.

Image credits:Mark and Colleen Hayward/Redferns

The two had a romantic relationship for 18 months before he eventually reconciled with Ono in early 1975.

During an interview withVanity Fair, originally conducted in 2015 and republished last month on February 27 to coincide with the release of the documentaryMan on the Run, Lennon's former bandmate Paul McCartney revealed doubts that the now 93-year-old Ono once had about her latehusband's sexual orientation.

Image credits:Mirror Syndication International/Mirrorpix via Getty Images

He told the outlet about an incident from 1980, shortly after Lennon was fatally sh*t by an obsessed fan, Mark David Chapman, when Ono reportedly called him and said she believed her husband "might have been gay."

He recalled, "She rang me not long after John d**d and said, 'You know, I think John might have been gay.'"

John Lennon's second wife, Yoko Ono, reportedly voiced her doubts about her late husband's sexuality to McCartney following Lennon's passing

Image credits:Jack Mitchell/Getty Images

However, the 83-year-old musicianexpressed skepticismabout Ono's claim, citing his long personal and professional history with Lennon.

McCartney added, "I went, 'I'm not sure.' I said, 'I don't think so. Certainly not when I knew him'… because we'd been in the '60s. We'd been around with loads and loads of girls. And I bumped into seeing him jacking … a lot of girl action."

Moreover, Paul claimed that despite often sharing beds while touring, there was "never a gesture, never an expression" that suggested Lennon was attracted to men.

Image credits:Bob Gruen

"There was never anything… It was nothing. So I had no reason to believe this at all."

McCartney also suggested Ono's comment may have been a product of the intense emotional distress following Lennon's passing, noting that he himself said "crazy things" after losing his first wife, Linda McCartney, who passed away in 1998.

"When I lost Linda, Isaid some pretty crazy things. I look back on them now and go, That's grief. That's just what you do."

Advertisement

Image credits:United Press International

TheHere Comes The Sunsinger also addressed the long-running speculation surrounding a 1963 trip Lennon took to Spain with theBeatles' manager, Brian Epstein, who was openly gay, which had fueled rumors at the time.

But Paul dismissed the trip as a "power play" on Lennon's part, saying, "Brian would ask him as a homosexual thing – a good-looking boy who Brian fancied. They went down to Spain, had a fun time. No doubt John would play into the thing."

The claims were further fueled by long-standing rumors surrounding the relationship between John and the band's former gay manager

"I personally didn't think anything had happened. Certainly never heard about anything happening. But I saw it as, 'You want to deal with the Beatles? I'm the leader.'"

The comments did not sit well with fans of the music legend, many of whom harshly criticized both Yoko and Paul over what they perceived as the"questionable timing" of the claims.

One person said, "Right, when the man can't defend himself… Who cares John Lennon was awesome fabulous songwriter singer it's no one's business let John rest in peace."

Image credits:Keystone-France/Gamma-Keystone via Getty Images

Another added, "Even if he was ono shouldn't be sharing that," while a third user in agreement commented, "Sorry but even if John was gay, why should it make any difference to the man he was and still remembered as?"

One netizen bluntly wrote online, "That's just gossip.It's a shamethat McCartney is spreading it. I'm sure there are rumors about him too regarding this or that."

Others questioned, "He's been d**d for 46 years, and suddenly this is a story? Unless they've uncovered some lost Beatles' recordings, I really don't care what he did in his off time."

Image credits:Capitol Records

"I wouldn't believe a word Yoko Ono says…"

However, some fans speculated that the Imagine singer might have been bisexual instead.

One user expressed, "He might have been bi… It was the 50's, 60's and 70's so people experimented se*xually…"

While Paul denied the speculation, netizens criticized him, with many questioning his "motive" and "timing" for bringing up the resurfaced claims

Image credits:Ethan Miller/Getty Images

Others echoed the sentiment, with one adding, "Very possible that he was bisexual…"

The bisexual speculation had also surfaced in a 2015 interview withThe Daily Beast, where Ono stated that she and John believed everyone was naturally bisexual, but that Lennon was likely "too inhibited" to ever act on any desires he might have had for men.

She shared with the publication, "John and I had a big talk about it, saying, basically, all of us must be bisexual. And we were sort of in a situation of thinking that we're not [bisexual] because of society. So we are hiding the other side of ourselves, which is less acceptable."

As for the musical partnership between Lennon and McCartney, it is widely considered one of the most successful and influential in music history.

ThedocumentaryMan on the Runfocuses on Paul's life and career between the breakup of theBeatlesin 1970 and Lennon's demise in 1980.

The film concludes in the early 1980s, exploring how Lennon's demise devastated McCartney and ultimately contributed to the end of the bandWings, which he had formed with his wife Linda.

"Who cares, his music was incredible and is what defines him," wrote one fan of the English music legend

Paul McCartney Stuns Beatles Fans After Revealing Yoko Ono’s Claim About John Lennon’s Sexuality

Paul McCartneyhassparked outrageamongBeatlesfans after resurfacing acontroversial claimonce made byYoko Onoabout her husb...
6 years since COVID-19 pandemic began. What happened March 11, 2020

It has been six years since theCOVID-19 pandemicbegan and though aftershocks continue to affect us all, one day stands out as monumental.

USA TODAY

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declaredCOVID-19a global pandemic, as theNBAsuspended its season,Tom Hankstested positive for the virus and PresidentDonald Trumpannounced a U.S. travel ban.

That morning, during a meeting with the House Oversight and Reform Committees, then-Chief Medical Advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci warned lawmakers that, "Things will get worse than they are right now." At the time, 118,000 cases and 4,291 deaths related to COVID-19 had been reported in 114 countries. As of Feb. 22, more than7.1 million COVID-19-related deathshad been reported in 231 countries, according to WHO, with 1.2 million deaths in the U.S.

Here's a look at the key moments from the start of the COVID-19 pandemic on March 11, 2020.

Nation:Ex-Missouri lawmaker who admitted to COVID fraud sentenced to prison

WHO declares pandemic

Not long after Fauci made his statements on March 11, 2020, WHOdeclaredCOVID-19 a global pandemic.

Cities ban large gatherings

Throughout the day, government officials across the U.S. putbans on large gatherings, aimed at reducing the spread of the virus.

Former San Francisco Mayor London Breed prohibited gatherings of more than 1,000 people, former Washington Gov. Jay Inslee and former Oregon Gov. Kate Brown put bans on events of 250 people throughout their states.

First positive case on Capitol Hill

A staff member for Washington Sen. Maria Cantwell was thefirst individual on Capitol Hill to test positive for the viruson March 11, 2020.

Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) speaks during a roundtable discussion at the U.S. Capitol on President Donald Trump's economy on Feb. 26, 2026.

NBA suspends season; NCAA rolls back March Madness crowds

The NCAAannouncedthat due to the virus outbreak, March Madness would only be held with the players, essential staff and limited family in attendance. A day later, the men's and women's basketball tournaments werecanceled.

Advertisement

The evening of March 11, 2020, shortly before tipoff between theOklahoma City ThunderandUtah Jazz, referees and coaches learned that Jazz center Ruby Gobert was positive for the virus. The game was postponed and then ultimately, the National Basketball Associationsuspended the remainder of its 2019-2020 season.

Tom Hanks, Rita Wilson test positive

Chet Hanks, from left, Tom Hanks, Rita Wilson and Truman Hanks attend the world premiere of Apple TV+'s "Masters of the Air" at Regency Village Theatre in Los Angeles on Jan. 10, 2024.

Actor Tom Hanks posted a photo onInstagram, sharing that he and his wife, Rita Wilson, tested positive for COVID-19.

"We felt a bit tired, like we had colds, and some body aches. Rita had some chills that came and went. Slight fevers too. To play things right, as is needed in the world right now, we tested for the Coronavirus, and were found to be positive," Hanks wrote in hispost. "We'll keep the world posted and updated. Take care of yourselves!"

Trump declares nationwide emergency, issues travel ban

In the evening of March 11, 2020, TrumpdeclaredCOVID-19 a nationwide emergency and announced a 30-day travel ban on non-U.S. citizens traveling from 26 European countries would be implemented at the end of the week.

Six years later: March 11, 2026

While social distancing and masks have faded away, COVID-19 variants still circulate, primarily during cold and flu season.

Last year, COVID-19-related deaths peaked the week of Jan. 11, 2025, with reported1,049 deaths, according to the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC). In comparison, the peak number of weekly deaths in 2024, also in January, was 2,587 deaths. And for an even more drastic comparison, the peak number of weekly deaths in 2021, in early January, was 31,349 deaths, according to the CDC.

As of March 10, COVID-19 cases were only growing in two states –Virginia and Arkansas, according to the CDC. Throughout most of the country, cases were on the decline.

As of November 2025, the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control recommended the2025-2026 COVID-19 vaccinefor anyone over the age of six months. The vaccine is particularly important, the CDC states, for folks who have never received a COVID-19 vaccine, are 65 and up, are at high risk for the virus, live in a long-term care facility and are pregnant, breastfeeding and/or trying to get pregnant.

Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her atgcross@usatoday.com.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Looking back on the COVID-19 pandemic, six years later

6 years since COVID-19 pandemic began. What happened March 11, 2020

It has been six years since theCOVID-19 pandemicbegan and though aftershocks continue to affect us all, one day stands ou...
Haleon makes oral-health push in China as other Western brands falter

By Alexander Marrow

Reuters The Haleon factory in Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China, March 10, 2026. REUTERS/Go Nakamura The Haleon factory in Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China, March 10, 2026. REUTERS/Go Nakamura

Haleon's factory in China

LONDON, March 11 (Reuters) - Haleon is stepping up its Chinese expansion, pushing into second- and third-tier cities and tailoring its gum-health products to local ‌tastes, aiming to succeed where many Western consumer brands have struggled.

Sluggish demand and fierce ‌competition have hit Western heavyweights from BMW to Pernod Ricard and Nike, which all reported weaker China sales last ​year.

But Haleon, helped by strong growth in Sensodyne toothpaste, is doubling down with a 65 million pound ($87 million) investment in a new oral-health plant in Shanghai. CEO Brian McNamara says the goal is to take its Parodontax brand into more than 30 cities by the end of 2027.

"For us, ‌China's an incredible market," he ⁠told Reuters, citing mid-teens growth for Sensodyne and an 860 million-pound gum-health market.

"Over 70% of consumers in China suffer from gum health issues," McNamara said. "We ⁠have a product to address it. There's a clear consumer need."

SWEETER FLAVOUR, FOAMIER TOOTHPASTE

China accounts for about 10% of Haleon's 11-billion-pound business and nearly 13% of the $59 billion global oral-health market, which Mordor ​Intelligence ​expects to reach about $80 billion by 2031.

Haleon relaunched Parodontax ​in China in late 2024 after ‌an unsuccessful attempt around five years ago, Jayant Singh, global head of oral health, told Reuters.

Advertisement

Now in 10,000 outlets across 19 cities, the product has been tailored to Chinese tastes with a sweeter, more fragrant flavour, a foamier brushing feel and glossier packaging.

"It's these minor nuances that you need to put into your mix to really drive acceptance," Singh said.

Sensodyne, Haleon's largest ‌brand, is used by around 11% of Chinese households, ​Singh said, well behind local leader Yunnan Baiyao, which ​Haleon estimates at 29.8%.

Some Western firms are ​scaling back in China. Starbucks in November sold control of its China ‌operations to Boyu Capital after weak sales, ​and Nike is resetting ​its China strategy after successive quarterly sales declines.

Haleon, by contrast, last year bought the Chinese government out of its local joint venture for about 700 million pounds.

McNamara joined British ​Prime Minister Keir Starmer's January ‌trip to China and said meetings with senior regulators were valuable.

"We've found the ​Chinese government very supportive of what we're trying to do," he said.

($1 = 0.7507 ​pounds)

(Reporting by Alexander Marrow. Editing by Mark Potter)

Haleon makes oral-health push in China as other Western brands falter

By Alexander Marrow Haleon's factory in China LONDON, March 11 (Reuters) - Haleon is stepping up its Chi...

 

SnS JRNL © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com